Skip to main content
🇪🇸 Español 🇧🇷 Português 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇫🇷 Français 🇯🇵 日本語 🇮🇹 Italiano 🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia 🇹🇷 Türkçe 🇰🇷 한국어 🇵🇱 Polski 🇳🇱 Nederlands
Image Converter Document Converter Video Converter Audio Converter
Tools Formats (201) Guides Pricing · 🎟️ 1,99 € API
Log In
.OPML VS .TXT

OPML vs TXT

A detailed comparison of OPML Outline and Plain Text — file size, quality, compatibility, and which format to choose for your workflow.

Instant Transcoding Pipeline
Instant RAM Engine Zero Logs Retention

Technical Specifications

Specification .OPML .TXT
MIME type text/x-opml text/plain
Extension .opml —
Format XML with nested <outline> elements —
Standard OPML 2.0 (2006) —
Primary use RSS subscription interchange —
Common encodings — UTF-8, UTF-16, ASCII, ISO-8859-1, Windows-1252
Line endings — LF (Unix), CRLF (Windows), CR (classic Mac)
Max file size — Limited only by filesystem (no format-level limit)
Structure — None — flat sequence of characters
Advertisement

Strengths Comparison

.OPML Strengths

  • Standard RSS subscription interchange format.
  • Simple XML — easy to parse and generate.
  • Highly extensible via arbitrary attributes.
  • Supported by every major outline and RSS tool.

.TXT Strengths

  • Universally readable — every operating system, every editor, every programming language.
  • Zero metadata overhead: the file size equals the character count (for ASCII).
  • Safe to diff, grep, version-control, and pipe through command-line tools.
  • Immune to format obsolescence: a text file from 1970 still opens today.
  • Tiny footprint for structured data like logs or configuration.

Limitations

.OPML — Limitations

  • XML verbosity — larger than a JSON-based equivalent.
  • Specification is loose — different tools disagree on edge cases.
  • Primary use (RSS reading) has shrunk dramatically since Google Reader.
  • No strong central stewardship.

.TXT — Limitations

  • No styling, images, or embedded structure — just characters.
  • Character encoding ambiguity (ISO-8859-1 vs UTF-8 vs Windows-1252) causes "mojibake".
  • Line-ending differences between OSes still cause subtle bugs today.
  • No way to carry hyperlinks, tables, or formatting without a convention on top (like Markdown).

Frequently Asked Questions

OPML (OPML Outline) is a document format used to store paginated text, with optional formatting, tables, images, hyperlinks, headers and footers. It sits in the documents & text family and is typically associated with a specific office suite or publishing pipeline that defined the format and ships the canonical reader.

TXT (Plain Text) is a document format used to store paginated text, with optional formatting, tables, images, hyperlinks, headers and footers. It sits in the documents & text family and is typically associated with a specific office suite or publishing pipeline that defined the format and ships the canonical reader.

Modern office suites — Microsoft Word, Google Docs, LibreOffice Writer, Apple Pages — open most OPML files with reasonable fidelity. If your installed software does not support OPML, convert to DOCX or PDF first using KaijuConverter; both open in virtually every reader, including free online viewers.

Modern office suites — Microsoft Word, Google Docs, LibreOffice Writer, Apple Pages — open most TXT files with reasonable fidelity. If your installed software does not support TXT, convert to DOCX or PDF first using KaijuConverter; both open in virtually every reader, including free online viewers.

Upload the OPML to KaijuConverter and pick DOCX, PDF, ODT, RTF, HTML, Markdown, or plain text. Our pipeline runs LibreOffice headlessly plus pandoc for text formats — the same engines behind professional document pipelines. Styles, tables, images, and hyperlinks survive the conversion intact.

Yes, to a high degree. Standard fonts, headings, lists, tables, images, hyperlinks and page structure transfer cleanly. Custom fonts substitute to the closest match if not embedded; obscure layout features unique to OPML (frames, legacy macros) may flatten to static content in the target format.

Professional Workstation Solution
Unlimited Batch Jobs Zero Upload Wait Times Direct Disk-to-Disk I/O

Need to Convert Gigabyte Archives or Mass Folders?

KaijuConverter delivers ultra-fast in-memory conversions for everyday tasks. For multi-gigabyte production workloads without browser bandwidth bottlenecks, explore high-throughput desktop suites.

Zero cloud transfer • Native hardware performance
24-Hour Day Pass (€1.99 one-time) Up to 1 GB · No subscription

One-time payment with zero recurring commitment: convert files up to 1 GB and 50-file batches for 24 hours.

Instant Stripe Checkout →
Kaiju Cloud Starter (€3/mo) Up to 250 MB / file

Convert large videos, PDFs, and lossless audio directly in your browser—100% ad-free with priority queue.

Instant Stripe Checkout →
Kaiju Cloud Pro (€9/mo) Up to 1 GB + 50 Batch

High-throughput cloud pipeline for files up to 1,024 MB, 24-hour encrypted storage, and priority processing.

Instant Stripe Checkout →
ImageMagick CLI / XnConvert Free • Mass Batch

Convert thousands of camera RAW files (CR3, NEF, ARW) to WebP, AVIF, or TIFF in one pass.

Affinity Photo / Adobe Lightroom Photo Pro

GPU-accelerated RAW development with end-to-end 16-bit ICC color profile management.

Advertisement
We use cookies and similar technologies to personalise content and ads, and to analyse traffic. Learn more about cookies.